For agencies

Client proofing software that looks as organized as your work

One workspace per client. Every website, logo, brochure and video edit in it. Pinned feedback on the real thing, numbered rounds, and a sign-off with a name and a time. Built by an agency that got tired of doing it in email.

14 days of Studio. No card needed.
Before

The way it usually goes

Monday you send the staging link and a Figma export. Wednesday the client replies to a different thread with a screenshot in a Word document. Thursday their marketing manager sends a voice note. Friday the CEO looks at it on his phone and asks why the menu is broken. The following Wednesday you are on a call reconstructing what round two actually is.

None of them are being difficult. They have nowhere to put it.

RE: RE: FW: homepage v3feedback_FINAL2.docxVoice note · 2:41“make it pop”Reply to the wrong threadScreenshot 2026-09-14.png
After

The way it goes with HopBack

Monday you send one link. Every stakeholder opens it, types their name, and pins their comments on the exact element, at the width they are looking at, with the reference image attached when they have one. Round one closes when the client hits Finish review. Round two opens with what was still unresolved. On Friday the approval lands in Slack with a name and a time, and the developer starts from a list, not a thread.

app.hopback.io/share/7f3a…c91e
Pam Beeslyon the hero
Swap this photo for the team shot.
Approved · Fri 4:12 pm

From the logo to the launch, your client only learns one thing

Most client relationships run in a sequence: the logo, the brand, the brochure, the website, the packaging, the launch video. And most agencies review each one in a different place. Feedback on the logo by email. Sticky notes on the brochure PDF. Comments in Figma for the site, once the client has worked out how to get in. Every stage, a new tool for the client to learn and a new place for the feedback to get lost.

HopBack is the same link every time. The client learned it on the logo. By the website they are pinning comments at mobile width without being asked. Every round of every deliverable lives in their folder, in order, with the approvals.

Logo
Brochure
Website
Packaging
Video

And a word on Figma

It is the right tool for designers. It is a hard place to put a client. They need an account, the interface is built for people who make things rather than people who approve them, and it is easy for a client to wander into pages, versions and comments they were never meant to see, or to review the wrong frame at the wrong size. HopBack shows the client one thing, the thing you sent, and nothing else.

Homepage.fig12 pages · 48 frames · every version
app.hopback.io/share/7f3a…c91e
1
One page. Nothing else.

Why agencies choose it

Your client will actually use it

No account, no invite, no password. And it is a better experience than email: pointing at things is easier than describing them, so clients get specific without being coached, and the review feels more like a walk-through than homework. Adoption is the whole game and this is why HopBack wins it.

Everything you make, one link

The website, the concept PDF before it, the logo, the brochure, the packaging, the launch video. Same pins, same rounds, same sign-off, and the client never has to learn a second tool.

Rounds match your contract

Three rounds in the proposal, three rounds in HopBack, and the client can see which one they are in. A fourth is a line item, not a surprise.

A record for the awkward conversation

Approval is on the work, attributed and timestamped, and the feedback locks. When the brief drifts, you point.

HopBack does the chasing

Business-day reminders in your voice, stopping the moment the client finishes.

Unlimited clients, always

Reviewers are never seats. Add every stakeholder on every project and the price does not move.

Sticky pins on live sites

Pins anchor to the element and stay put when copy changes or the client switches to mobile width.

No AI slop. The feedback is theirs, because it has to be

A newer problem is landing in agency inboxes: AI slop. Feedback the client did not write. They pasted the brief, or a screenshot, into an AI and forwarded what came back. Twelve paragraphs, very confident, about a design the AI never opened, and the client cannot explain half of it on the call.

HopBack is a quiet fix. A pin has to be placed by a person looking at the real thing. They click the heading, they type what they think about the heading. It is short because pins are short, specific because pins are specific, and theirs because nobody else was in the room. You get what the client actually thinks, which is the only feedback worth a round.

Feedback.docx
Pam Beeslyon the heading
This heading is too long on mobile.

Proofing, not just feedback

Print designers have always proofed: numbered proof, deadline, signature. HopBack brings that to everything an agency makes. The pins are the conversation. The rounds, the lock and the recorded approval are the proof.

HomepageRound 3 of 3Finish review
1
2
Approved by Pam BeeslyFri 9 Oct, 4:12 pm · 14 comments resolved · feedback locked

Fits the agency stack

Pricing for agencies

Studio
$49 a month

5 seats, 30 active reviews, 100 GB. Reminders, Slack and Teams, video, Compare.

Agency
$99 a month

12 seats, unlimited reviews, 500 GB. MCP for your AI tools.

What agencies say

We swapped a fourteen-email thread for one link. Our client did the whole review on her phone in the back of an Uber, and every comment landed on the exact element she meant.

Tessa MoranCreative Director, a six-person web studio, Sydney

Rounds changed how we quote. Three rounds in the contract, three rounds in HopBack, and the client can see exactly which one we are on. Scope creep became a conversation instead of an argument.

Luis HerreraFounder, a design and development agency, Portland

Our print clients pin the barcode, the bleed, the Pantone reference, straight on the artwork. It replaced the marked-up PDF and the phone call that used to follow it.

Hannah ReidStudio Manager, a brand and packaging studio, Auckland
FAQ

Questions

Will my clients need training?

No. They open a link, type their name and click the thing they mean. For the rare client who wants a walkthrough, there is a one-page reviewer guide you can send with the link, and it is what the Help link inside every review opens.

Can multiple people from the client's side review the same project?

Yes, from the same link, each under their own name. There is no limit on reviewers on any plan.

Can I keep clients separate?

Yes. Each client has a folder in your workspace and each review has its own link. Clients only ever see the reviews you share with them.

Does it work for print and packaging as well as websites?

Yes. Upload the artwork and the same pins, rounds and approval apply.

Can I run a fixed number of rounds?

Yes. Set the number when you create the review; it shows to the client. Add a round later if scope grows.

Why not just use Figma comments?

Figma is built for designers, not for the people approving the work. Clients need an account, can see more than the thing you sent, and often review the wrong frame at the wrong size. HopBack shows the client exactly one thing, on a link, with no account, and it works the same on a logo, a PDF, a live website and a video.

How is this different from Markup.io or BugHerd?

Unlimited reviewers on every plan, no monthly review meter, sticky pins, numbered rounds with carry-forward, a finish-review lock and attributed approval. HopBack is built for client sign-off, not bug tracking.

Run your next project through one link